|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| Uniform
Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals |
| |
|
Compiled
by Word-Medex |
| |
|
| |
The editors
of some major biomedical journals published in English decided on uniform technical
requirements for manuscripts to be submitted to their journals. These requirements,
including formats for bibliographic references developed for the Vancouver Group
by the National Library of Medicine, were published in 1979. The Vancouver Group
evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Close to
500 journals have agreed to receive manuscripts prepared in accordance with the
requirements. It is important to emphasize what these requirements imply and what
they do not.
- The requirements are instructions
to authors on how to prepare manuscripts, not to editors on publication style.
(But many journals have drawn on these requirements for elements of their publication
styles.)
- If authors prepare their manuscripts
in the style specified in these requirements, editors of the participating journals
will not return manuscripts for changes in style before considering them for publication.
Even so, in the publishing process journals may alter accepted manuscripts to
conform with details of the journal's publication style.
Authors sending manuscripts to a
participating journal should not try to prepare them in accordance with the publication
style of that journal but should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts
Submitted to Biomedical journals. However, authors must follow the instructions
to authors in the journal as to what topics are suitable for that journal and
the types of papers that may be submitted-for example, original articles, reviews,
or case reports. In addition, the journal's instructions are likely to contain
other requirements unique to that journal, such as number of copies of manuscripts,
acceptable languages, length of articles, and approved abbreviations. Participating
journals are expected to state in their instructions to for authors that their
requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts
Submitted to Biomedical Journals and to cite a published version. This document
will be revised at intervals.
Top
|
| |
Summary
of Requirements |
| |
|
| |
- Type the manuscript double-spaced,
including title page, abstract, text, acknowledgments, references, tables, and
legends.
- Each manuscript component should
begin on a new page, in the following sequence: title page, abstract and key words,
text, acknowledgments, references, tables (each table complete with title and
footnotes on a separate page), and legends for illustrations.
- Illustrations must be good-quality,
unmounted glossy prints, usually 127 x 173 mm (5x7 in), but no larger than 203
x 254 mm (8 x 10 in). Submit the required number of copies of manuscripts and
illustrations (see journal's instructions) in a heavy paper envelope. The submitted
manuscript should be accompanied by a covering letter, as described under Submission
of Manuscripts, and permissions to reproduce previously published material
or to use illustrations that may identify human subjects.
- Follow the journal's instructions
for transfer of copyright, Authors should keep copies of everything submitted.
Top
|
| |
Prior
and Duplicate Publication |
| |
|
| |
Most journals
do not wish to consider for publication a paper on work that has already been
reported in a published article or is described in a paper submitted or accepted
for publication elsewhere, in print or in electronic media. This policy does not
usually preclude consideration of a paper that has been rejected by another journal
or of a complete report that follows publication of a preliminary report, usually
in the form of an abstract. Nor does it prevent consideration of a paper that
has been presented at a scientific meeting, if not published in full in a proceedings
or similar publication. Press reports of the meeting will not usually be considered
as breaches of this rule, but such reports should not be amplified by additional
data or copies of tables and illustrations. When submitting a paper, an author
should always make a full statement to the editor about all submissions and previous
reports that might be regarded as prior or duplicate publication of the same or
very similar work. Copies of such material should be included with the submitted
paper to help the editor decide how to deal with the matter. Multiple publication-that
is, the publication more than once of the same study, irrespective of whether
the wording is the same-is rarely justified. Secondary publication in another
language is one possible justification, providing the following conditions are
met.
- The editors of both journals concerned
are fully informed; the editor concerned with secondary publication should have
a photocopy, reprint, or manuscript of the primary version.
- The priority of the primary publication
is respected by a publication interval of at least two weeks.
- The paper for secondary publication
is written for a different group of readers and is not simply a translated version
of the primary paper; an abbreviated version will often be sufficient.
- The secondary version reflects faithfully
the data and interpretations of the primary version.
- A footnote on the title page of
the secondary version informs readers, peers, and documenting agencies that the
paper was edited, and is being published, for a national audience in parallel
with a primary version based on the same data and interpretations. A suitable
footnote might read as follows: "This article is based on a study first reported
in the [title of journal, with full reference]."
Multiple publication other than as
defined above is not acceptable to editors. If authors violate this rule, they
may expect appropriate editorial action to be taken.
Preliminary release, usually to public media, of scientific information described
in a paper that has been accepted but not yet published is a violation of the
policies of many journals. In a few cases, and only by arrangement with the editor,
preliminary release of data may be acceptable- for example, to warn the public
of health hazards.
Top
|
| |
Preparation
of Manuscript |
| |
|
| |
Type or
print out the manuscript on white bond paper, 216 x 279 mm (8.5 x 11"), or ISO
A4 (212 x 297 mm), with margins of at least 25 mm (1"). Type or print on only
one side of the piper. Use double-spacing throughout, including title page, abstract,
text, acknowledgments, references, individual tables, and legends. Number pages
consecutively, beginning with the title page. Put the page number in the upper
or lower right-hand corner of each page.
Title Page
- The title page should contain:
- The title of the article, which
should be concise but informative.
- First name, middle initial, and
last name of each author, with highest academic degree(s) and institutional affiliations.
- Name of department(s) and institution(s)
to which the work should be attributed.
- Disclaimers, if any.
- Name and address of author responsible
for correspondence about the manuscript.
- Name and address of author to whom
requests for reprints should be addressed or statement that reprints will not
be available from the author.
- Source(s) of support in the form
of grants, equipment, drugs, or all of these.
- A short running head or foot line
of no more than 40 characters (count letters and spaces) placed at the foot of
the title page and identified.
Authorship. All persons
designated as authors should qualify for authorship. The order of authorship should
be a joint decision of the coauthors. Each author should have participated sufficiently
in the work to take public responsibility for the content.
Authorship credit should be based
only on substantial contributions to:
- Conception and design, or analysis
and interpretation of data.
- Drafting the article or revising
it critically for important intellectual content.
- Final approval of the version to
be published.
Conditions (a), (b), and (c) must
all be met. Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection
of data does not justify authorship. General supervision of the research group
is not sufficient for authorship. Any part of an article critical to its main
conclusions must be the responsibility of at least one author.
- Editors may require authors to
justify the assignment of authorship. Increasingly, multicenter trials are attributed
to a corporate author. All members of the group who are named as authors, either
in the authorship position below the title or in a footnote, should fully meet
the criteria for authorship as defined in the Uniform Requirements. Group
members who do not meet these criteria should be listed, with their permission,
under acknowledgments or in an appendix (see Acknowledgments).
Abstract and Key Words
- The second page should carry an
abstract (of no more than 150 words for unstructured abstracts or 250 words for
structured abstracts). The abstract should state the purposes of the study or
investigation, basic procedures (selection of study subjects or laboratory animals;
observational and analytical methods), main findings (give specific data and their
statistical significance, if possible), and the principal conclusions. Emphasize
new and important aspects of the study or observations.
-
- Below the abstract provide, and
identify as such, three to 10 key words or short phrases that will assist indexers
in cross-indexing the article and may be published with the abstract. Use terms
from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus; if suitable
MeSH terms are not yet available for recently introduced terms, present terms
may be used.
Text
- The text of observational and experimental
articles is usually but not necessarily-divided into sections with the headings
Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Long articles may need subheadings
within some sections to clarify their content, especially the Results and Discussion
sections. Other types of articles such as case reports, reviews, and editorials
are likely to need other formats. Authors should consult individual journals for
further guidance.
-
-
Introduction
- State the purpose of the article.
Summarize the rationale for the study or observation. Give only strictly pertinent
references, and do not review the article extensively. Do not include data or
conclusions from the work being reported.
-
- Methods
Describe your selection of the observational
or experimental subjects (patients or laboratory animals, including controls)
clearly. Identify the methods, apparatus (manufacturer's name and address in parentheses),
and procedures in sufficient detail to allow other workers to reproduce the results.
Give references to established methods, including statistical methods (see below);
provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have been published
but are not well known; describe new or substantially modified methods, give reasons
for using them, and evaluate 'their limitations. Identify precisely all drugs
and chemicals used, including generic name(s), dose(s), and route(s) of administration.
Ethics. When
reporting experiments on human subjects, indicate whether the procedures followed
were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on
human experimentation (institutional or regional) or with the Helsinki Declaration
of 1975, as revised in 1983. Do not use patients' names, initials, or hospital
numbers, especially in illustrative material. When reporting "experiments on animals,
indicate whether the institution's or the National Research Council's guide for,
or any national law on, the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
Statistics. Describe
statistical methods with enough detail to enable a knowledgeable reader with access
to the original data to verify the reported results. When possible, quantify findings
and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty
(such as confidence intervals). Avoid sole reliance on statistical hypothesis
testing, such as the use of P values, which fails to convey important quantitative
information. Discuss eligibility of experimental subjects. Give details about
randomization. Describe the methods for and success of any blinding of observations.
Report treatment complications. Give numbers of observations. Report losses to
observation (such as dropouts from a clinical trial). References for study design
and statistical methods should be to standard works (with pages stated) when possible
rather than to papers in which the designs or methods were originally reported.
Specify any general-use computer programs used. Put general description of methods
in the Methods' section. When data are summarized in the Results section, specify
the' statistical methods used to analyze them. Restrict tables and figures to
those needed to explain the argument of the paper and to assess its support. Use
graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries; do not duplicate data in
graphs and tables. Avoid nontechnical uses of technical terms in statistics, such
as "random" (which implies a randomizing device), normal," "significant correlations,"
and "sample." Define statistical terms, abbreviations, and most symbols.
Results
Present results in logical sequence
in the text, tables, and illustrations. Do not repeat in the text all the data
in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations.
Discussion
Emphasize the new and important aspects
of the study and the conclusions that follow from them. Do not repeat in detail
data or other material given in the Introduction or I the Results section. Include
in the Discussion section the implications of the findings and their limitations,
including implications for future research. Relate the observations to other relevant
studies. Link the conclusions with the goals of the study but avoid unqualified
statements and conclusions not completely supported by your data. Avoid claiming
priority and alluding to work that has not been completed. State new hypotheses
when warranted, but clearly label them as such. Recommendations, when appropriate,
may be included.
Acknowledgments
At an appropriate place in the article
(title-page footnote or appendix to the text; see the journal's requirements)
one or more statements should specify:
Contributions that need acknowledging
but do not justify authorship, such as general support by a departmental chair.
Acknowledgments of 'technical help.
Acknowledgments of financial and
material support, specifying the nature of the support.
Financial relationships that may
pose a conflict of interest.
Persons who have contributed intellectually
to the paper but whose contributions do not justify authorship may be named and
their function or contribution described-for example, "scientific adviser," "critical
review of study proposal...... data collection," or "participation in clinical
trial." Such persons must have given I their permission to be named.
Authors are responsible for obtaining
written permission from persons acknowledged by name, because readers may infer
their endorsement of the data and conclusions.
Technical help should be acknowledged
in a paragraph separate from those acknowledging other contributions.
References
Number references consecutively in
the order in which they are first mentioned in the text. Identify references in
text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in parentheses. References cited
only in tables or in legends to figures should be numbered in accordance with
a sequence established by the first identification in the text of the particular
table or figure.
Use the style of the examples below,
which are based with slight modifications on the formats used by the US National
Library of Medicine in Index Medicus. The titles of journals should be
abbreviated according to the style used in Index Medicus. Consult List
of Journals Indexed in Index Medicus, published annually as a separate publication
by the library and as a list in the January issue of Index Medicus.
Try to avoid using abstracts as references;
"unpublished observations" and "personal communications" may not be used as references,
although references to written, not oral, communications may be inserted (in parentheses)
in the text.
Include in the references papers
accepted but not yet published designate the journal and add "In press." Information
from manuscripts submitted but not yet accepted should be cited in the text as
"unpublished observations" (in parentheses).
The references must be verified by
the author(s) against the original documents.
Examples of correct forms of references
are given below.
Top
|
| |
Articles
in Journals |
| |
|
| |
Standard
journal article (list all authors, but if the number exceeds six, give six followed
by et al.):
-
You CH, Lee KY, Chey RY, Menguy R.
Electrogastrographic study of patients with unexplained nausea, bloating and vomiting.
Gastroenterology 1980 Aug;79:311-4.
- As an option, if a journal carries
continuous pagination throughout a volume, the month and issue number may be omitted:
- You CH, Lee KY, Chey RY, Mcnguy
R. Electrogastrographic study of patients with unexplained nausea, bloating and
vomiting. Gastroenterology 1980;79:311-4.
-
Goare AM, Haynes AR, Owen MJ, Farrall
M, James LA, Lai LY, et al. Predisposing locus for Alzheimer's disease on chromosome
21. Lancet 1989;1:352-5.
Organization as author:
- The Royal Marsden Hospital Bone-Marrow
Transplantation Team. Failure of syngeneic bone- marrow graft without preconditioning
in post-hepatitis marrow aplasia. Lancet 1977;2:742- 4.
No author given:
- Coffee drinking and cancer of the
pancreas (editorial). BMJ 1981; 283:628.
Article not in English:
- Massone L, Borghi S, Pestarino A,
Piccini R, Gambini C. Localisations palmaires purpuriques de la dermatite herperiforme.
Ann Dermatol Vencreol 1987;114:1545-7.
Volume with supplement:
- Magni F, Rossoni G, Berti F. BN-52021
protects guinea-pig from heart anaphylaxis. Pharmacol Res Commun 1988;20 (Suppl
5):75-8.
Issue with supplement:
- Gardos G, Cole JO, Haskell D, Marby
D, Paine SS, Moore P. The natural history of tardive dyskinesia. J Clin Psychopharmacol
1988; 8(Suppl 4):31S-37S.
-
Volume with part:
- Hanly C. Metaphysics and innateness:
a psychoanalytic perspective. Int J Psychoanal 1988;69(Pt 3):389-99.
Issue with part:
- Edwards L, Meyskens F, Levine N.
Effect of oral isotretinoin on dysplastic nevi. J Am Acad Dermarol 1989;20(2 Pt
1):257-60.
Issue with no volume:
- Baumeister AA. Origins and control
of stereotyped movements. Monogr Am Assoc Merit Defic 1978;(3):353-84.
No issue or volume:
- Danoek K. Skiing in and through
the history of medicine. Nord Medicinhist Arsb 1982:86- 100.
Pagination in Roman numerals:
- Ronne Y. Ansvarsfall. Bloodtransfusion
ill[sicl fel patient. Vardfacket 1989;13:XXVI- XXVII.
Type of article indicated as needed:
- Spargo PM, Manners JM. DDAVP and
open heart surgery [letter]. Anaesthesia 1989;44:363- 4.
-
- Fuhrman SA, Joiner KA. Binding of
the third component of complement C3 by Toxoplasma gondii [abstract]. Clin Res
1987;35:475A.
Article containing retraction:
- Shishido A. Retraction notice: Effect
of Platinum compounds on murine lymphocyte mitogenesis [Retraction of Alsabti
EA, Ghalib ON, Salem MH. In: Jpn J Med Sci Biol 19 9;32:S3-6S]. Jpn J Med Sci
Biol 1980;33:235-7.
Article retracted:
- Alsabti EA, Ghalib ON, Salem MH.
Effect of platinum compounds on murine lymphocyte mitogenesis [Retracted by Shishido
A. In: Jpn J Med Sci Biol 1980;33:235-7]. Jpn J Med Sci Biol 1979;32:53-65.
Article containing comment:
-
Piccoli A, Bossatti A. Early steroid
therapy in IgA neuropathy: still an open question [comment]. Nephron p 9;51:289-91.
Comment on: Nephron 1988;48:12-7.
Article commented on:
-
Kobayashi Y, Fujii K, Hiki Y, Tatenorokawa
A, Kamiyama M. Steroid therapy in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective study in heavy
proteinuric cases [see comments]. Nephron 1988;48:12-7. Comment: Nephron 1989;51:289-91.
Article with published erratum:
-
Schofield A. The CAGE questionnaire
and psychological health [published erratum appears in Br J Addict -989;84:7011.
Br J Addict 1988;83:761-4.
Top
|
| |
Books
and Other Monographs |
| |
|
| |
- Personal author(s):
-
Colson JH, Armour WJ. Sports injuries
and their treatment. 2nd rev. ed. London: S. Paul, 1986.
-
- Editor(s), compiler as author:
-
Diener HC, Wilkinson M, editors.
Drug-induced headache. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
- Organization as author and publisher:
-
Virginia Law Foundation. The medical
and legal implications of AIDS. Charlottesville: The Foundation, 1987.
- Chapters in a book:
-
Weinstein L, Swartz MN. Pathologic
properties of invading microorganisms. In: Sodeman WA Jr, Sodeman WA, editors.
Pathologic physiology. mechanisms of disease. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1974: 457-72.
- Conference proceedings:
-
Vivian VL, editor. Child abuse and
neglect: a medical community response. Proceedings of the First AMA National Conference
on Child Abuse and Neglect; 1984 Mar 30-31; Chicago. Chicago: American Medical
Association, 1985.
- Conference paper:
-
Harley NH. Comparing radon daughter
dosimetric and risk models. In: Gammage RB, Kaye SV, editors. Indoor air and human
health. Proceedings of the Seventh Life Sciences Symposium: 1984 Oct 2931; Knoxville
CM). Chelsea (Ml): Lewis,' 1985:69-78.
- Scientific or technical report:
-
Akutsu T. Total heart replacement
device. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Heart and Lung
Institute; 1974 Apr. Report No.: NIH-NHLI-69-2185-4.
- Dissertation:
-
Youssef NM. School adjustment of
children with congenital heart disease (dissertation]. Pittsburgh (PA): Univ.
of Pittsburgh, 1988.
- Patent:
-
Harred JF, Knight AR, McIntyre JSI
inventors. Dow Chemical Company, assignee. Epoxidation process. US patent 3,654,317.
1972 Apr 4.
Top
|
| |
Other
Published Material |
| |
|
| |
- Newspaper article:
-
Rensberger B, Specter B. CFCs may
be destroyed by natural process. The Washington Post 1989 Aug 7;Sect. A:2 (col.
5).
- Audiovisual:
-
AIDS epidemic: the physician's role
[video-recording). Cleveland (OH): Academy of Medicine of Cleveland, 1987.
- Computer file:
-
Renal system (computer program].
MS-DOS version. Edwardsville (KS): MediSim, 1988.
- Legal material:
-
Toxic Substances Control Act: Hearing
on S. 776 Before the Subcomm. on the Environment of the Senate Comm. on Commerce.
94th Cong., 1st Sess. 343 (1975).
- Map:
-
Scotland (topographic map]. Washington:
National Geographic Society (US), 1981.
- Book of the Bible:
-
Ruth 3:1-18. The Holy Bible. Authorized
King James version. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1972.
- Dictionary and similar references:
-
Ectasia. Doriand's illustrated medical
dictionary. 27th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1988:527.
- Classical material:
-
The Winter's Tale: act 5, scene 1,
lines 13-16. The complete works of William Shakespeare. London: Rex, 1973.
Top
|
| |
Unpublished
Material |
| |
|
| |
In press:
Lillywhite HD, Donald JA. Pulmonary
blood flow regulation in an aquatic snake. Science. In press.
Top
|
|
|
| |
Tables
- Type or print out each table double-spaced
on a separate sheet.
- Do not submit tables as photographs.
- Number tables consecutively in the
order of their first citation in the text and supply a brief tide for each.
- Give each column a short or abbreviated
heading. Place explanatory matter in footnotes, not in the heading. Explain in
footnotes all nonstandard abbreviations that are used in each table.
- Identify statistical measures of
variations such as standard deviation and standard error of the mean.
- Do not use internal horizontal and
vertical rules.
- Be sure that each table is cited
in the text.
- If you use data from another published
or unpublished source, obtain permission and acknowledge fully.
- The use of too many tables in relation
to the length of the text may produce difficulties in the layout of pages. Examine
issues of the journal to which you plan to submit your paper to estimate how many
tables can be used per 1000 words of text.
- The editor, on accepting a paper,
may recommend that additional tables containing important backup data too extensive
to publish be deposited with an archival service, such as the National Auxiliary
Publications Service in the United States, or made available by the authors. In
that event an appropriate statement will be added to the text. Submit such tables
for consideration with the paper.
Illustrations (Figures)
- Submit the required number of complete
sets of figures.
- Figures should be professionally
drawn and photographed; freehand or typewritten lettering is unacceptable.
- Instead of original drawings, roentgenograms,
and other material, send sharp, glossy black-and-white photographic prints, usually
127 x 173 mm (5x7"), but no larger than 203 x 254 mm (8x10") are acceptable. Letters,
numbers, and symbols should be clear and even throughout and of sufficient size
that, when reduced for publication, each item will still be legible. Titles and
detailed explanations belong in the legends for illustrations, not on the illustrations
themselves.
- Each figure should have a label
pasted on its back indicating the number of the figure, author's name, and top
of the figure. Do not write on the back of figures or scratch or mark them by
using paper clips. Do not bend figures or mount them on cardboard.
- Photomicrographs must have internal
scale markers. Symbols, arrows, or letters used in the photomicrographs should
contrast with the background.
- If photographs of persons are used,
either the subjects must not be identifiable or their pictures must be accompanied
by written permission to use the photograph.
- Figures should be numbered consecutively
according to the order in which they have been first cited in the text. If a figure
has been published, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission
from the copyright holder to reproduce the material. Permission is required irrespective
of authorship or publisher, except for documents in the public domain.
- For illustrations in color, ascertain
whether the journal requires color negatives, positive transparencies, or color
prints. Accompanying drawings marked to indicate the region to be reproduced may
be useful to the editor. Some journals publish illustrations in color, only if
the author pays for the extra cost.
Legends for Illustrations
- Type or print out legends for illustrations
double-spaced, starting on a separate page, with Arabic numerals corresponding
to the illustrations.
- When symbols, arrows, numbers, or
letters are used to identify parts of the illustrations, identify and explain
each one clearly in the legend.
- Explain the internal scale and identify
the method of staining in photomicrographs.
Units of Measurement
- Measurements of length, height,
weight, and volume should be reported in metric units (meter, kilogram, or liter)
or their decimal multiples.
- Temperatures should be given in
Celsius. Blood pressures should be given in millimeters of mercury.
- All hematologic and clinical chemistry
measurements should be reported in the metric system in terms of the International
System of Units (SI). Editors may request that alternate or non-SI units be added
by the authors before publication.
- Abbreviations and Symbols
- Use only standard abbreviations.
- Avoid abbreviations in the title
and abstract.
- The full term for which an abbreviation
stands should precede its first use in the text unless it is a standard unit of
measurement.
Top
|
| |
Submission
of Manuscript |
| |
|
| |
Mail the required number of manuscript
copies in a heavy-paper envelope, enclosing the manuscript copies and figures
in cardboard, if necessary, to prevent bending of photographs during mail handling.
Place photographs and transparencies in a separate heavy-paper envelope.
Manuscripts must be accompanied
by a covering letter (press here for
an example provided by Word-Medex) signed by all co-authors. This must
include:
- Information on prior or duplicate
publication or submission elsewhere of any part of the work as defined earlier
in this document.
- Statement of financial or other
relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.
- A statement that the manuscript
has been read and approved by, all authors, that the requirements for authorship
as previously stated in this document have been met, and furthermore, that each
coauthor believes that the manuscript represents honest work.
- The name, address, and telephone
number of the corresponding author, who is responsible for communicating with
the other authors about I revisions and final approval of the proofs.
- The letter should give any additional
information that may be helpful to the editor, such as the type of article in
the particular journal the manuscript represents and whether the author(s) will
be willing to meet the cost of reproducing color illustrations.
- The manuscript must be accompanied
by copies of any permissions to reproduce published material, to use illustrations
or report sensitive personal information about identifiable persons, or to name
persons for their contributions.
Top
|
| |
Manuscripts
on Diskettes |
| |
|
| |
For
papers that are close to final acceptance, some journals require authors to provide
manuscripts in electronic form (on diskettes) and may accept a variety of word-processing
formats or text (ASCII) files. When submitting diskettes, authors should:
- Be certain to include a printout
of the manuscript version on the diskette.
- Put only the latest version of the
manuscript on the diskette.
- Name the file clearly.
- Label the diskette with the file
format and the file name.
- Provide information on hardware
and software used.
Authors should consult the journal's
information for authors for acceptable formats, file- and diskette-naming conventions,
number of copies to be submitted, and other details.
Top
|
| |
Participating
Journals |
| |
|
| |
Journals that have notified the International
Committee of Medical journal Editors of their willingness to consider for publication
manuscripts prepared in accordance with earlier versions of the committee's Uniform
Requirements identify themselves as such in their information for authors.
A full list is available on request from the Secretariat Office at Annals of
Internal Medicine.
Top
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
[Home]
[Editing Services] [Submit
a Manuscript] [Contact] [Sitemap]
Copyright (c) 1995 Word-Medex Pty
Ltd. All rights reserved. |